Demystifying music copyright 1: From printing press to public performance royalties

Before there were record labels, streaming platforms, or performing rights organizations, there was a songwriter and a printing press. Here's how the music industry built its first revenue streams - and why the systems created in the 1800s still underpin how creators get paid today.
alternatetext
Chat icon
Transcript
CONTENTS

Introduction

If you've ever felt overwhelmed by the inner workings of the music industry - performing rights organizations, mechanical royalties, sync licensing, publishing deals, master recordings - you're not alone. Most people working in the industry learned it piecemeal, picking up pieces of the puzzle over years of experience without ever getting a clear picture of the whole.

The best way to get that picture is to start at the beginning and follow the technology. Every major revenue stream in the music industry exists because a new technology created a new way to reproduce and distribute music, and the people who created that music eventually found a way to get paid from it. Follow that thread from the printing press to the streaming platform and the whole system starts to make sense.

This series does exactly that. We'll move through history one technological development at a time, looking at how each one created new opportunities, new conflicts, and eventually new laws and new revenue streams. By the end you'll have a clear understanding of where the money comes from, who collects it, and why the industry works the way it does.

A note before we start: the history here is deliberately loose. The goal is context and clarity, not a perfectly accurate legal or historical account. Please seek professional advice before entering into any legally binding agreements.

Let's start with what the music industry is actually built on.

What is intellectual property?

Intellectual property refers to original creations - things you make with your mind that can be protected under law. Copyright is the specific legal protection that applies to creative works, giving the creator the exclusive right to control how others copy, reproduce, and monetize what they've made.

In music, copyright protection applies to two distinct types of intellectual property. Understanding the difference between them is the foundation of everything else in this series.

The first is the song - also called the composition or musical work. A song consists of the melody, harmony, and lyrics. It's the underlying creative work that can be performed by anyone, recorded thousands of times in thousands of different versions, and still belongs to the person who wrote it. Songs are owned by songwriters and typically monetized through music publishers (Randall Wixen has a great book about music publishing).

The second is the sound recording - also called the master. A sound recording is a specific fixed performance of a song, captured on tape, vinyl, a digital file, or any other medium that can be reproduced. Every time a song is recorded, that recording is its own separate piece of intellectual property, distinct from the song itself. Sound recordings are owned by the performer or the entity that financed the recording - usually a record label.

The relationship between these two types of IP is one of the most important things to understand about the music industry. If thirty different artists record the same song, there are thirty different sound recordings - each owned by whoever made it - but there is still only one song, owned by the original songwriter. When any of those recordings is streamed, sold, or licensed, both the recording owner and the songwriter are entitled to be compensated separately.

This two-sided structure - song and recording, publishing and master - runs through everything that follows.

How is music reproduced?

Copyright protection matters because every interaction with music involves some form of reproduction of the underlying intellectual property. Understanding what counts as reproduction is key to understanding where royalties come from.

A few examples to illustrate:

When sheet music is printed and sold, the song is being reproduced in a physical format. The songwriter is entitled to be compensated for each copy sold.

When a band plays a song at a venue, that performance is a reproduction of the song. The venue is using the song to create an atmosphere that sells tickets and drinks. The songwriter is entitled to be compensated for that use.

When a song is recorded and sold - whether on vinyl, cassette, CD, or as a digital download - both rights are being reproduced and monetized simultaneously. The recording owner receives income from the sale of the recording itself. The songwriter receives a mechanical royalty for the reproduction of the song embedded in that recording. Two separate rights, two separate payments, from the same transaction. This is the clearest everyday example of the two-sided structure of music intellectual property in action.

When a song is synchronized with a film or television show, both the song and the specific recording used are being reproduced in a new context. The songwriter and the recording owner are each entitled to be compensated separately - which is why sync licensing always involves two separate licenses.

The key distinction running through all of these examples is between personal use and commercial use. Playing a song at home for your own enjoyment is not a commercial reproduction. Playing the same song in a venue, on a radio station, or in a film that will reach a paying audience is - and that's where the royalty system applies.

Keep that distinction in mind as we work through the history. Every revenue stream in the music industry exists because someone found a new way to commercially reproduce music and eventually the people who created it found a way to get paid from it.

Timeline of early music publishing, print technology and public performance royalties

In the beginning there were songwriters

To make this history feel a little more tangible, we're going to follow a cast of imaginary characters through the early part of the story. They're not real, but the situations they find themselves in are - and they'll help illustrate how the music industry actually developed and why it works the way it does today.

It's the mid-late 1800s and a songwriter called Alex loves composing new songs on the piano.

Alex has formal musical training and can transcribe her songs onto manuscript paper and make copies for her friends to play. Her friend Jamie is an amazing performer and loves playing Alex's songs at the saloon on the corner. On Thursdays they throw a dance party that really goes off when they play Alex's songs. The punters drink up a storm, the saloon makes bank, Jamie's band is living well off the gigs - but Alex hasn't made a cent.

A few local musicians hear about the parties and want to tour Alex's songs across the country. They head over to Alex's house and ask if they can buy the sheet music. Alex is happy to sell but it takes ages to hand-transcribe each song. There has to be a better way.

Enter the music publisher and their printing press

Fortunately for Alex, printing press technology is evolving quickly and a few savvy entrepreneurs have started printing, publishing, and distributing sheet music. Music stores are hungry for song books to sell alongside their instruments, and popular songs from the local saloon sell fast.

Sam, a music fanatic, has recently set up a publishing company. He heard about Alex's songs and got in touch to see if she would write songs for him to publish and distribute.

Sam paid Alex a cash advance on the future sale of a thousand books in exchange for ownership of the song copyrights. Profits would be split 50/50 between them.

Alex is thrilled and buys a new piano. Sam prints the books, hires song pluggers to play the songs in music stores - an early form of marketing - and the business grows.

This arrangement between songwriter and publisher became the foundation of the music publishing industry. The songwriter creates the work. The publisher invests in reproducing and distributing it, takes ownership of the copyright, and splits the revenue. It was an imperfect arrangement - publishers held significant power and songwriters often gave up more than they should have - but it established the basic model that still exists in various forms today.

💡 What is a royalty? A royalty is a payment made for the ongoing use of intellectual property. Even though the work was created in the past, it earns royalties each time it is used or reproduced in the future. This concept - that a creative work can keep generating income long after it was made - is central to everything that follows.

Tin Pan Alley in New York City became the hub where songwriters and publishers met, wrote songs, and made deals. Music stores expanded distribution. Publishers issued print licenses to other publishers in different territories to print and sell locally in exchange for ongoing royalty payments - an early version of the sub-publishing model that still operates internationally today.

The problem with live performance

As printed sheet music spread, so did the repertoire available to live performers. Bands had more songs to play, audiences had more songs they recognized, and the live music scene grew rapidly. Venues were thriving - selling tickets, food, and drinks off the back of music that Alex and songwriters like her had written.

The problem was the same one that had existed before the printing press. Alex was paid once for the sale of the sheet music. The venue, the performers, and the promoters were benefiting from the same songs night after night with no ongoing compensation to the songwriter.

One evening Alex and Sam are sitting at the saloon watching the band play Alex's songs to a packed, dancing crowd. Beer and money are flowing freely. They look at each other and ask the same question: without Alex's songs, would any of this be happening?

They approached the saloon owner about paying a small royalty each time Alex's songs were performed. The saloon owner laughed them out of the bar. Surely the exposure was enough - weren't they selling plenty of sheet music already?

Alex and Sam weren't the only ones with this problem. A group of successful songwriters and publishers across the country were equally frustrated. Their songs were driving the live music industry and they were getting nothing from it beyond the initial print sale.

ASCAP and the birth of performance royalties

In 1914 a group of songwriters and publishers in the United States came together to form the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers - ASCAP. The model was based on SACEM in France, which had been collecting performance royalties since 1851.

The idea was straightforward. Rather than individual songwriters trying to negotiate with individual venues - and getting laughed out of bars - the songwriters and publishers would band together, pool their catalogs, and approach venues collectively. A venue that wanted to play any song from the ASCAP repertoire - which effectively meant any popular song - would need to pay an annual license fee. ASCAP would collect those fees and distribute them as performance royalties to its members.

This type of organization became known as a Performing Rights Organization, or PRO. Almost every country now has at least one - APRA in Australasia, PRS in the UK, SOCAN in Canada, GEMA in Germany. The US has several, including BMI and SESAC which we'll touch on in Part Two.

The PRO model worked because the collective leverage was something no individual songwriter had. A venue could ignore one songwriter asking for a royalty. It couldn't easily ignore an organization that controlled access to every popular song being written.

How does a PRO work?

The mechanics of the PRO model are worth understanding clearly because they underpin a significant portion of the royalty income available to songwriters and publishers today.

Songwriters and publishers join their local PRO as members and register their songs. This establishes the PRO's licensable repertoire - essentially a registry of every song available to be performed under the blanket license.

The PRO issues performance licenses to venues, radio stations, broadcasters, and any other business that publicly performs music. The license fee is typically based on the size or revenue of the business - a small venue pays less than a major broadcaster. In exchange, the licensee can perform any song in the PRO's repertoire without negotiating individual permissions.

Venues and performers submit set lists and performance reports so the PRO knows which songs were played. The PRO reviews this data and distributes performance royalties to the relevant songwriters and publishers. Every country's PRO has reciprocal agreements with every other PRO in the world, so international performances generate royalties that flow back to the songwriter's home territory.

When performance royalties are paid out, they are split 50/50 between the songwriter and the publisher. These are referred to as the writer share and the publisher share. If a songwriter doesn't have a publisher, they receive both shares - 100% of the performance royalty - because they are effectively their own publisher by default.

💡 Keep in mind that each PRO is handling millions of songs and enormous volumes of data from thousands of sources. The accurate distribution of royalties is a complex and imperfect science, and there are often significant delays between a performance occurring and the royalty being paid.

What is the difference between a publisher and a PRO?

This is one of the most common points of confusion in the music industry and it's worth addressing directly.

A music publisher is a for-profit business that owns or represents song copyrights. Publishers are rights holders - they own a piece of the song. They monetize all of the different income streams available to a song: print royalties, mechanical royalties from recordings, sync licensing fees, and performance royalties collected through the PRO. Publishers seek out and sign deals with songwriters, help develop their careers, connect them with opportunities, and proactively work to grow the value of the songs they represent. Traditionally a publishing deal involved the songwriter delivering a set number of songs per year to be recorded by notable artists, in exchange for an advance and an ongoing royalty share.

A Performing Rights Organization is typically a not-for-profit entity that does not own any copyrights. The PRO maintains a registry of its members' songs, issues performance licenses to businesses that use music publicly, collects the resulting royalties, and distributes them to the songwriters and publishers. The PRO's focus is specifically on performance income - it doesn't handle mechanical royalties, sync fees, or print income.

The simplest way to think about it: the publisher owns and exploits the copyright across all income streams. The PRO collects one specific type of income - performance royalties - on behalf of the publishers and songwriters who are its members.

Sub-publishers and publishing administrators

Two other roles are worth understanding before we move on.

A sub-publisher is a publishing company that works on behalf of an original publisher in a specific territory. If a US based publisher has songs generating royalties in Germany but no presence there, they might appoint a German sub-publisher to register their songs with the local PRO, collect royalties on their behalf, and pass the income back. This is how international royalty collection is structured - a network of sub-publishing relationships that ensures income from performances around the world eventually finds its way back to the original publisher and songwriter.

Without a sub-publisher, international royalties travel through the PRO network - from the foreign PRO to the local PRO to the publisher - which can be slow and adds additional layers of administration. Sub-publishers streamline this and often allow income to be collected at source, meaning it arrives faster and with less handling.

A publishing administrator specializes in registering songs and collecting royalties on behalf of songwriters or smaller publishers who don't want or need a full publishing deal. The key difference from a traditional publisher is that the administrator doesn't take ownership of the songs - they simply manage the administrative work of registration and collection in exchange for a fee or percentage. For independent songwriters who want to maintain ownership of their catalog but ensure it's properly managed, a publishing administrator can be a valuable alternative to a full publishing deal.

Must know terms

A few essential identifiers that will come up throughout this series:

ISWC - International Standard Work Code. Every song registered with a PRO is issued an ISWC, a unique identifier that links the song to its owners across every PRO in the world. ISWCs always begin with the letter T followed by ten digits — for example T-123.456.789-0. When you register a song, make sure it has an ISWC assigned.

IPI number - Interested Party Information number, sometimes called an IPNN. Every songwriter and publisher has a unique IPI number - think of it as a social security number for music rights. It links you to every song you own or have a share in, and ensures that royalties generated by those songs are attributed to you correctly. You receive an IPI number when you join a PRO.

At source income - A term describing royalties paid directly from the source - often a PRO - to the original publisher, without passing through a sub-publisher or other intermediary and being subject to an additional commission. Negotiating at source income is generally preferable for publishers and songwriters where possible.

What we've covered

In this first article we've established the foundation that the rest of the series builds on.

Music intellectual property consists of two distinct types - songs and sound recordings - each with separate ownership and separate revenue streams.

The music publishing industry grew from the printing press, with publishers and songwriters collaborating to print, distribute, and monetize songs.

Performance royalties emerged when songwriters realized that venues were profiting from their songs night after night with no compensation flowing back to the creators. PROs were formed to collect and distribute those royalties through blanket licensing.

Publishers and PROs serve different but complementary roles - publishers own and exploit copyrights across all income streams, while PROs focus specifically on performance royalty collection.

In Part Two we move into audio recording technology - the player piano, the phonograph, and the birth of the recorded music industry - and look at how mechanical royalties came to exist and what they mean for songwriters and recording artists today.